Notes

Wikipedia Review Review is an Web discussion forum as well as blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Foundation projects
Wikipedia Evaluation is an Internet forum and blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure projects, specifically the content and also conflicts of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia watchdog internet site, inspecting Wikipedia and reporting on its flaws. It offers an independent discussion forum to discuss Wikipedia editors and also their influence on Wikipedia content. At its top, participants consisted of existing Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, individuals prohibited from Wikipedia, and individuals that had never ever edited.

The site was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and also held by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it relocated to its very own domain making use of Invision Power Board software program. The site called for enrollment using a legitimate e-mail address to upload and blacklisted e-mail carriers that permitted anonymity so as to discourage the procedure of several accounts by a single individual.

Look What I Found was mentioned for its discussion of wiki-editing concepts as well as its engagement in the assessment of the Palo Alto Study Company's WikiDashboard.

Commentary
Wikipedia Testimonial is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building exercise, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not meant as a resource or training school for those who would certainly instill concern and also anguish in others. It does not exist to corrupt, but to subject corruption; it does not exist to tear down organizations, yet to expose the ways in which establishments are torn down; it does not exist to despise, yet is implied to reveal hate in others. To reveal these things is not evil. It is not a monolithic entity, neither the sum of its parts. Like-mindedness does not imply singularity of purpose; respect for the civil liberties of one team does not imply disrespect for the legal rights of another. It is not planned to be predictable, regular, or plain.

Visualize a globe in which people are not customer accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not simple words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Declaration made when the site was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Evaluation
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Testimonial has actually given a centerpiece for investigation into Wikipedia-related issues such as the "Essjay dispute". Cade Metz, composing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Evaluation with the exploration of a private subscriber list that caused the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator; he additionally composed that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" meant to outlaw the mention of Wikipedia Testimonial and comparable websites on Wikipedia. The Independent noted that "allegations versus specific administrators came to a head on a website called Wikipedia Review, where individuals debate the administrators' actions." The Irish innovation internet site Silicon Republic suggested seeing Wikipedia Review in order to " adhere to disputes, conversations, editors and also basic administration on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens utilized messages made on Wikipedia Testimonial to assist build a report, released in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner as well as accusations that knowledge companies had actually been using Wikipedia to spread out disinformation.

Material as well as framework
Wikipedia Review's openly accessible online forums are broken up into four basic topic areas:

Online forum info;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which consists of subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta discussion, posts as well as general Wikimedia-focused topics not fitting in other places;
Media discussion forums including a information feed and also discussion about information and also blog sites including Wikipedia/Wikimedia; and also
Off topic, non-Wikimedia associated discussion.
Click To Read

Homepage: http://www.hhchevyreviews.com/