Notes

Wikipedia Review Evaluation is an Net forum as well as blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure jobs
Wikipedia Testimonial is an Internet online forum and blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Structure jobs, particularly the content as well as conflicts of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia guard dog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia and reporting on its flaws. It supplies an independent online forum to review Wikipedia editors and also their impact on Wikipedia content. At its height, participants consisted of present Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, users outlawed from Wikipedia, and individuals who had never ever modified.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and also hosted by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it transferred to its own domain name utilizing Invision Power Board software application. The site called for registration utilizing a valid e-mail address to upload and also blacklisted e-mail carriers that allowed privacy so as to discourage the procedure of multiple accounts by a solitary individual.

Wikipedia Review was cited for its conversation of wiki-editing concepts and also its involvement in the examination of the Palo Alto Research Business's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building exercise, a parlor game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not suggested as a resource or training school for those who would infuse anxiety and also suffering in others. It does not exist to corrupt, yet to subject corruption; it does not exist to tear down institutions, yet to subject the ways in which establishments are torn down; it does not exist to hate, but is indicated to expose hate in others. To subject Resources reviews is not bad. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the sum of its parts. Like-mindedness does not indicate singularity of objective; regard for the civil liberties of one group does not suggest disrespect for the rights of another. Helpful Hints is not planned to be predictable, consistent, or dull.

Imagine a world in which human beings are not individual accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not plain words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Declaration made when the site was out of service in 2008, Wikipedia Review
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Evaluation has actually given a prime focus for investigation right into Wikipedia-related issues such as the "Essjay dispute". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, credited Wikipedia Review with the discovery of a personal mailing list that caused the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator; he likewise wrote that a Wikipedia proposal called "BADSITES" meant to outlaw the mention of Wikipedia Review as well as comparable sites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that "allegations versus particular managers came to a head on a website called Wikipedia Testimonial, where people debate the administrators' actions." The Irish modern technology site Silicon Republic suggested checking out Wikipedia Evaluation in order to " comply with conflicts, discussions, editors and general administration on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens made use of posts made on Wikipedia Testimonial to aid construct a report, published in Nexus Magazine, on WikiScanner and accusations that intelligence companies had been using Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Web content and framework
Wikipedia Testimonial's publicly accessible forums are broken up into four basic topic locations:

Online forum information;
Wikimedia-oriented conversation, which consists of subforums focusing on editors, the Wikipedia administration, meta discussion, posts and general Wikimedia-focused topics not fitting in other places;
Media forums consisting of a news feed and discussion concerning information as well as blogs featuring Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well as
Off subject, non-Wikimedia related discussion.
References

My Website: https://assetstore.unity.com/publishers/18311