Notes

The smart Trick of PFAS testing needed for people with elevated exposures, US That Nobody is Discussing


<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject">
<img class="featurable" style="max-height:300px;max-width:400px;" itemprop="image" src="https://ocfs.ny.gov/programs/childcare/assets/images/lead-testing.jpg" alt="Safe at Home? Lead in Tap Water Remains Issue in Some City Dwellings"><span style="display:none" itemprop="caption">Find Out If Your Park's Drinking Fountain Has Lead in Its Water - WNYC News - WNYC</span>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject">
<img class="featurable" style="max-height:300px;max-width:400px;" itemprop="image" src="https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/lkDLCpFLAXoC_0gNp2djAVH0gwHPn9D5u2xnqUbEppMQxOtOLjPDI5HvdBKpZ9C3wKprwwfeRjGfujrHnED9GPFVWwPCNDXrc_XJhKwYvMAxFG9njfSTX8W4R97iR22m7Q=w1280" alt="Top honors: NYC tap water named best in taste test : r/nyc"><span style="display:none" itemprop="caption">New York's landmark water testing law hinges on the state Health Department - City &amp; State New York</span>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<h1 style="clear:both" id="content-section-0">Getting My New York Moves on Some of Strictest PFAS Drinking Water To Work<br></h1>
<br>
<p class="p__0">"We should not retreat from this nationwide management when resolving other PFAS."&lt; Enacting laws vs. managing The expense passed in June does not control the 23 emerging impurities as strictly as the state presently controls PFOA and PFOS. For those 2, water suppliers that go beyond the 10 ppt optimum contamination limitation should formally inform their clients and remediate the problem.</p>
<br>
<p class="p__1">Skoufis stated he would have chosen to require the health department to set levels of contamination for the 23 contaminants at which it would require removal. But Olympian Cares feared that would have endangered the expense's opportunities of winning assistance. Instead, he hopes notice will press the public to demand removal from regional authorities.</p>
<br>
<p class="p__2">Peggy Kurtz, of the Rockland Water Coalition, said her group was "baffled" by the notification Suez Water New york city sent to Rockland water clients in November 2020, after tests revealed PFOA concentrations of 19 ppt, nearly double the 10 ppt limit needing remediation. "Consuming drinking water with PFOA at or somewhat above the maximum contamination limit does not present a substantial health threat," the company's needed notice told clients.</p>
<br>
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/ImageObject">
<img class="featurable" style="max-height:300px;max-width:400px;" itemprop="image" src="https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/8823ba96e573ec93df2d311034849105be15b692/0_293_4696_2817/master/4696.jpg?width=1200&amp;height=1200&amp;quality=85&amp;auto=format&amp;fit=crop&amp;s=369adf57498ee6fcb3d323a9136624be" alt="How to Tell If Water Is Safe to Drink or Contaminated"><span style="display:none" itemprop="caption">Maintaining the Superiority of NYC's Drinking Water</span>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<p class="p__3">The notification didn't mention that seven other PFAS chemicals were likewise discovered in Rockland's water. In a statement responding to questions for this article, the department confirmed that the language in Suez's reaction "is constant with our templates." The statement discussed that it thought about water at the levels identified in Rockland County, despite the fact that it required remediation, safe to drink: "Maximum pollutant levels or drinking water standards are set far listed below levels that trigger health effects.</p>
<br>
<h1 style="clear:both" id="content-section-1">The Single Strategy To Use For Advocates hail agreement to protect New York's water from<br></h1>
<br>
<img width="389" src="https://4.imimg.com/data4/OY/XN/MY-11189042/drinking-water-testing-services.jpg">
<br>
<p class="p__4">This is why with the exception of pollutants like bacteria, the water may be appropriate to use while actions are being taken by the water provider to lower levels." In 2016, the EPA set nonenforceable drinking water advisories of 70 ppt for PFOA and PFOS integrated, thresholds well over the levels discovered in Rockland.</p>
<br>
<p class="p__5">In November, the EPA acknowledged that its present limits might be too high, noting "current clinical data and new analyses that suggest that negative health effects may happen at much lower levels of exposure to PFOA and PFOS than previously understood and that PFOA is a likely carcinogen." The company promised to update its health advisories and enforceable guidelines for PFAS later on this year.</p>
<br>

Homepage: https://paste2.org/A5amUtU3