Notes

Wikipedia Review Review is an Net forum as well as blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation projects
Wikipedia Testimonial is an Internet online forum as well as blog for the conversation of Wikimedia Foundation tasks, in particular the material as well as conflicts of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Testimonial is a Wikipedia guard dog web site, looking at Wikipedia and reporting on its imperfections. It gives an independent discussion forum to go over Wikipedia editors and also their influence on Wikipedia material. At its optimal, participants consisted of present Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, users outlawed from Wikipedia, and also people who had never ever modified.

Pop Over To This Web-Site was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and organized by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it relocated to its own domain utilizing Invision Power Board software application. The site called for enrollment using a legitimate e-mail address to post and blacklisted email carriers that enabled anonymity so as to dissuade the operation of numerous accounts by a single individual.

Wikipedia Evaluation was mentioned for its discussion of wiki-editing concepts and its engagement in the evaluation of the Palo Alto Study Firm's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Evaluation is not a conspiracy, a team-building exercise, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not indicated as a source or training school for those that would instill fear as well as torment in others. It does not exist to corrupt, yet to reveal corruption; it does not exist to take apart organizations, yet to expose the methods which establishments are taken down; it does not exist to hate, however is suggested to subject hate in others. To subject these points is not wicked. It is not a monolithic entity, neither the sum of its parts. Like-mindedness does not indicate selfhood of objective; regard for the legal rights of one group does not imply disrespect for the civil liberties of one more. It is not intended to be foreseeable, constant, or dull.

Envision a world in which human beings are not customer accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not plain words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Declaration made when the website ran out solution in 2008, Wikipedia Review
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Review has supplied a focal point for examination right into Wikipedia-related issues such as the "Essjay debate". Cade Metz, creating for The Register, credited Wikipedia Review with the exploration of a exclusive mailing list that led to the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator; he likewise wrote that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" meant to prohibit the mention of Wikipedia Review as well as similar websites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that " accusations versus specific managers capped on a site called Wikipedia Review, where people debate the administrators' activities." The Irish technology web site Silicon Republic suggested going to Wikipedia Review in order to "follow disagreements, discussions, editors and also basic administration on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens utilized articles made on Wikipedia Review to assist create a report, released in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner as well as accusations that intelligence agencies had been making use of Wikipedia to spread out disinformation.

Content as well as structure
Wikipedia Review's openly accessible online forums are separated right into four basic topic areas:

Online forum details;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which has subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia administration, meta discussion, short articles and also basic Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting in other places;
Media online forums having a information feed and conversation about information and blogs featuring Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well as
Off subject, non-Wikimedia related discussion.
Referrals

Website: https://djinni.co/jobs/company-nix-solutions-fe08e/?from=company_filter&keyword=BN+Digital