Notes

Wikipedia Review Testimonial is an Web discussion forum and blog site for the discussion of Wikimedia Structure jobs
Wikipedia Review is an Internet discussion forum and also blog site for the discussion of Wikimedia Foundation tasks, particularly the material as well as problems of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia watchdog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia and reporting on its problems. It offers an independent discussion forum to discuss Wikipedia editors and their impact on Wikipedia material. At Learn More NIX , individuals included present Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, customers banned from Wikipedia, as well as people that had never ever edited.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", and held by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it moved to its very own domain name utilizing Invision Power Board software. The website needed registration making use of a legitimate e-mail address to upload and also blacklisted email suppliers that allowed anonymity so regarding dissuade the procedure of multiple accounts by a single individual.

Wikipedia Testimonial was cited for its discussion of wiki-editing principles and its participation in the evaluation of the Palo Alto Study Firm's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Evaluation is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building exercise, a role-playing game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not suggested as a source or training school for those who would certainly impart anxiety and anguish in others. It does not exist to corrupt, yet to reveal corruption; it does not exist to tear down organizations, however to reveal the methods which establishments are taken down; it does not exist to dislike, but is indicated to expose hate in others. To reveal these points is not wicked. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the amount of its parts. Like-mindedness does not imply selfhood of objective; regard for the civil liberties of one group does not indicate disrespect for the legal rights of one more. It is not intended to be predictable, regular, or boring.

Think of a globe in which humans are not user accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not mere words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Statement made when the site ran out service in 2008, Wikipedia Review
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Testimonial has provided a centerpiece for examination right into Wikipedia-related matters such as the "Essjay dispute". Cade Metz, composing for The Register, credited Wikipedia Testimonial with the exploration of a exclusive newsletter that brought about the resignation of a Wikipedia administrator; he additionally composed that a Wikipedia proposal called "BADSITES" intended to prohibit the reference of Wikipedia Review and also comparable sites on Wikipedia. The Independent noted that "allegations versus specific managers came to a head on a site called Wikipedia Review, where people question the managers' actions." The Irish technology website Silicon Republic suggested checking out Wikipedia Evaluation in order to "follow disputes, discussions, editors as well as basic bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Pop Over To This Site made use of posts made on Wikipedia Testimonial to assist construct a record, published in Nexus Magazine, on WikiScanner as well as accusations that knowledge companies had been making use of Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Web content and structure
Wikipedia Evaluation's openly available forums are broken up into four basic topic areas:

Forum information;
Wikimedia-oriented conversation, which consists of subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta discussion, short articles as well as basic Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting in other places;
Media online forums consisting of a information feed and also discussion concerning news and also blog sites including Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well as
Off topic, non-Wikimedia relevant discussion.
Referrals

Homepage: http://nixsolutions.events/