Notes

Wikipedia Review Review is an Net online forum and also blog site for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure projects
Wikipedia Testimonial is an Web online forum as well as blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Structure tasks, particularly the content and problems of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Review is a Wikipedia watchdog website, scrutinizing Wikipedia as well as reporting on its problems. It supplies an independent discussion forum to go over Wikipedia editors and their influence on Wikipedia material. At its peak, participants included current Wikipedia editors, former Wikipedia editors, users outlawed from Wikipedia, and individuals who had never ever modified.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", as well as organized by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it transferred to its own domain using Invision Power Board software program. The website called for registration using a valid e-mail address to post and also blacklisted email suppliers that enabled privacy so regarding discourage the procedure of multiple accounts by a solitary individual.

Wikipedia Review was pointed out for its discussion of wiki-editing ideas and its engagement in the analysis of the Palo Alto Research study Business's WikiDashboard.

Discourse
Wikipedia Review is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building exercise, a parlor game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not meant as a resource or training ground for those who would instill worry as well as misery in others. See This Page reviews does not exist to corrupt, yet to expose corruption; it does not exist to take apart organizations, yet to reveal the methods which establishments are taken apart; it does not exist to dislike, yet is suggested to expose hate in others. To expose these things is not bad. It is not a monolithic entity, neither the sum of its parts. Like-mindedness does not indicate singularity of function; respect for the rights of one group does not imply disrespect for the legal rights of another. It is not planned to be predictable, consistent, or dull.

Picture a globe in which humans are not user accounts, are not programmable, and also are not simple words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Declaration made when the site was out of solution in 2008, Wikipedia Evaluation
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Review has actually supplied a focal point for examination into Wikipedia-related issues such as the "Essjay dispute". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, attributed Wikipedia Review with the exploration of a personal newsletter that caused the resignation of a Wikipedia manager; he also wrote that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" intended to prohibit the reference of Wikipedia Review as well as comparable websites on Wikipedia. The Independent kept in mind that "allegations against particular administrators came to a head on a site called Wikipedia Review, where people debate the managers' actions." The Irish innovation web site Silicon Republic recommended checking out Wikipedia Review in order to " adhere to conflicts, discussions, editors and general bureaucracy on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens utilized messages made on Wikipedia Testimonial to assist construct a report, released in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner and claims that intelligence firms had actually been utilizing Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Web content and also structure
Wikipedia Evaluation's publicly available discussion forums are separated into 4 general subject locations:

Online forum info;
Wikimedia-oriented discussion, which contains subforums concentrating on editors, the Wikipedia bureaucracy, meta conversation, short articles and basic Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting elsewhere;
Media forums including a information feed and conversation regarding information and also blog sites including Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well as
Off subject, non-Wikimedia associated discussion.
Recommendations

Read More: https://twitter.com/nixsolutions?lang=en