Notes

Info on 5G Towers in addition to Radiation Symptoms
The range of frequencies utilized in 5G networks has been classified as carcinogenic to humans by IARC. To know the possible health risks, it is beneficial to be aware of the risk classifications of the IARC for exposure to RF EMF. The spectrum of 5G networks is discussed in this article, along with Dr. Curry's conflicts of interest and the business.

IARC classification of RF-EMF exposure in the in the 2B group (possibly carcinogenic to humans)
The exposure to RF-EMF can be attributed to many sources, including personal electronics and external sources (such as base stations for cell phones and broadcast antennas) medical applications) as well as occupational exposure. Worldwide over 5 billion people are using cellphones, and the use is growing rapidly. Cell phone use is particularly high in low and middle-income countries, where over 70% of adults report owning a cell phone. The use of cell phones is also rising in countries with high incomes, with nearly ninety percent of people possessing one.

In the words of the IARC that exposure to RF-EMF may cause cancer in humans. But the data available today do not permit us to fully assess the risks of RF exposure. We are able to estimate how long exposure will cause cancer, should it occur.

check it out used by 5G networks
There are many kinds of frequencies that could be utilized for 5G network. Mid-band spectrum, for example is capable of high-speed speeds, but is not as effective when it comes to building coverage. In contrast high-band spectrum can support speeds as high as 10 Gbps. This means it is more efficient to 5G network in urban areas and high-traffic areas.


Spectrum for 5G networks depends on country regulations in addition to international norms. For instance, some countries utilize the 60-64GHz band, whereas others do not. In the United States, the FCC has set aside 7 GHz of spectrum for license-free operations between 57-64GHz.

5G networks will also use higher frequencies than 4G networks. This is because higher frequencies offer greater bandwidth than lower frequencies. The mmWave band, as an instance, have much more bandwidth than lower bands.

Dr. Curry's conflict of interest with industry
In August 2005, Dr. Curry contacted AI Life to request an independent medical examination as well as a medical records review. She also received a report from her primary doctor, Dr Goodkin, and a second report from Dr Glushakow. Both physicians disagreed with the findings of Dr. Goodkin concluded that Curry's knees were not strong enough for her to be able to commute regularly. On January 18, 2006, AI Life denied Curry's appeal. On April 11 of 2006, she filed an appeal in detail of the denial. For her argument, she cited Dr. the Glushakow report and an ear from a new medical expert named Dr. Dabrowski.

Curry's initial appeal was based on the fact the company AI Life had rejected her medical reports despite her claim that she was disabled. AI Life subsequently requested that her condition be examined by an independent doctor, the Dr. James M. Lee an orthopaedic surgeon board-certified. In his February 2 report Dr Goodkin found that Curry's impairment did not prevent her from working in a sedentary position. In the report, it was also noted it was the case that AI Life had not given Curry an ear modification that was appropriate for her condition.

My Website: https://www.proteckd.com/