Notes

Wikipedia Review Evaluation is an Web discussion forum and blog for the discussion of Wikimedia Structure projects
Wikipedia Evaluation is an Net discussion forum as well as blog site for the conversation of Wikimedia Structure tasks, specifically the material and disputes of Wikipedia. Wikipedia Evaluation is a Wikipedia watchdog web site, looking at Wikipedia and also reporting on its problems. It supplies an independent forum to go over Wikipedia editors and also their influence on Wikipedia content. At its top, individuals consisted of present Wikipedia editors, previous Wikipedia editors, individuals prohibited from Wikipedia, and individuals who had actually never edited.

The website was founded in November 2005 by "Igor Alexander", as well as organized by ProBoards. On 19 February 2006 it transferred to its very own domain using Invision Power Board software application. The website required enrollment utilizing a legitimate e-mail address to publish and also blacklisted e-mail suppliers that enabled privacy so regarding discourage the operation of numerous accounts by a single customer.

Wikipedia Testimonial was cited for its conversation of wiki-editing principles and also its involvement in the assessment of the Palo Alto Study Firm's WikiDashboard.

Commentary
Wikipedia Evaluation is not a conspiracy theory, a team-building exercise, a parlor game, or an experiment in collusion. It is not meant as a source or training school for those that would certainly impart worry and misery in others. It does not exist to corrupt, yet to reveal corruption; it does not exist to take apart establishments, but to expose the ways in which organizations are taken down; it does not exist to hate, however is implied to expose hate in others. To reveal these things is not bad. It is not a monolithic entity, nor the amount of its components. Like-mindedness does not indicate selfhood of function; regard for the legal rights of one team does not imply disrespect for the civil liberties of another. It is not meant to be predictable, constant, or plain.

Imagine a world in which humans are not individual accounts, are not programmable, as well as are not simple words on a display screen. That's what we're doing ...

-- Statement made when the site ran out service in 2008, Wikipedia Evaluation
Seth Finkelstein wrote in The Guardian that Wikipedia Testimonial has actually supplied a focal point for examination into Wikipedia-related matters such as the "Essjay debate". Cade Metz, writing for The Register, credited Wikipedia Review with the exploration of a personal newsletter that caused the resignation of a Wikipedia manager; he also created that a Wikipedia proposition called "BADSITES" planned to ban the reference of Wikipedia Testimonial as well as similar websites on Wikipedia. Official Statement noted that " claims versus particular managers came to a head on a website called Wikipedia Evaluation, where people discuss the administrators' activities." The Irish modern technology web site Silicon Republic recommended checking out Wikipedia Testimonial in order to "follow disagreements, discussions, editors and general administration on Wikipedia". Philip Coppens used articles made on Wikipedia Testimonial to aid create a record, released in Nexus Publication, on WikiScanner and accusations that knowledge companies had actually been using Wikipedia to spread disinformation.

Web content and structure
Wikipedia Evaluation's publicly easily accessible online forums are broken up into 4 general subject areas:

Discussion forum information;
Wikimedia-oriented conversation, which has subforums focusing on editors, the Wikipedia administration, meta discussion, short articles and basic Wikimedia-focused subjects not fitting in other places;
Media discussion forums having a information feed as well as discussion about information as well as blogs including Wikipedia/Wikimedia; as well as
Off topic, non-Wikimedia associated discussion.
References

Read More: https://kikonline.ru/partner/kak-pomoch-blizkomu-cheloveku-sbrosit-ves/