Notes

9 Observations About Blackjack Basic Strategy.12 Gambling Resolutions for the brand new Year in 2017.6 Quick Baccarat Math Facts You Need to Know
The best book about gambling I ever read was called The Mensa Guide to Casino Gambling by Andrew Brisman.

But a book about blackjack strategy (Sklansky Talks Blackjack) by David SKlansky was the 2nd best book on the subject.

That treatment of basic strategy, where he explains the math behind every possible decision, may be the inspiration for this blog post.

With any luck, the observations in this article will change what seems like an arbitrary chart with green and red cells into a thing that makes sense.

1. You always hit a hard total of 8 or less
It ought to be obvious why this can be the case, but let?s talk about it.

What?s the highest card you can get in this situation?

You can get an ace, which may give you a soft total of 19. That?s an improvement.

You could get a 10, which would give you a hard total of 18. That?s also a strong hand.

Actually, it?s impossible to bust with a difficult total of 8 or less.

It?s also almost impossible to win with a difficult total of 8 or less. The dealer just isn?t likely to bust often enough to ever stand with any total significantly less than 8.

2. You need to double down with a difficult total of 9 if the dealer has a 3, 4, 5, or 6
Not all casinos permit you to double down in this situation. If that?s the case where you?re playing, you then?ll play a difficult 9 exactly the same way you?d play a hard 8.

But if the dealer includes a 3, 4, 5, or 6, she?s likely to bust. Even if she doesn?t, by doubling down on that 9, you?re giving yourself a solid hand more often than not.

An 8, 9, 10, or ace is going to provide you with a total of 17 or higher in this example. That?s 28 cards out of the deck, so that?s a larger than 50% chance of improving to a 17 or better.

Combine that with the dealer?s probability of going bust, and you have a predicament where it makes a lot of sense to obtain additional money into action.

3. You should more often than not double down with a hard total of 10
If you have a hard total of 10, you have a great chance of winding up with a complete of 20 or 21. The only real exception is if the dealer includes a 10 or an ace showing. In those cases, you should still hit, but the dealer has a lot better potential for winding up with an extremely strong hand.

4. You should also almost always double down with a hard total of 11
11 is a magic number in blackjack, because all you need is a 10 to access a complete of 21.

And you can find more cards valued at 10 in the deck than any other value.

The 10s, jacks, queens, and kings all count as 10, and you can find 4 of each of them in the deck.

In case you don?t get a 10, you can?t go bust, and any card you get is going to enhance your hand.

5. Those will be the only hard hands you?ll ever double down on
You don?t have to worry about doubling down on any hard total in the game.

6. If the dealer has 6 or lower, you?re more prone to stand. If she has 7 or more, you?re more prone to hit
It?s inaccurate to state that you ought to always assume that the dealer has a 10 in the hole, but the reality is that there are more 10s in the deck than any card. If you think about the kinds of hand you?d would rather play, you?d probably rather not have to manage a 16, a 15, a 14, or a 13.

That?s because those totals are too low to stand a good chance of winning.

They?lso are high enough you have a strong possibility of going bust.

The dealer has no choice, though?she has going to any hard total of 16 or less. This means she has a high potential for going bust.

If you have a total of 16 versus a dealer 6, it makes sense to avoid the possibility of going bust. You?ve got a good chance of winning if so when the dealer busts.

On the other hand, if the dealer includes a 7 or higher, and you assume she has a 10 in the hole, you?re dealing with a possible total of 17. You?re almost bound to have to improve your hand to beat a 17, and you?re also going to start to see the dealer bust less often.

If you have a hard total of between 12 and 18, all you have to do is memorize the weird exceptions. The key number, the one where things go from stand going to, are the numbers 6 and 7.

Look at the predominant color on either side of the strategy chart to see why.

And of course, you?ll always stand on a hard total of 17+. You?re almost certain to go bust in the event that you hit that total.

7. The technique for playing pairs isn?t hard
The first thing to remember about pairs is that all of them are hard totals aside from a set of aces. This means if you?re not splitting them, you treat them as their appropriate hard total. Some 5s is really a hard 10, for instance. A couple of 6s is a hard 12, and so forth.

You have 2 pairs that you should always split?aces and 8s.

Splitting aces should be the obvious move, as you?re starting 2 new hands that have a pretty good chance of turning into naturals. These blackjacks would then earn you a 3 to 2 payout.

Splitting 8s is less obvious but still makes sense. You've got a hard total of 16, which is more likely to go bust.

But if you have 2 hands where the first card is an 8, you've got a good chance of winding up with a hard 18 on the next card. That?s a hand with a good chance of winning a showdown with a dealer.

You have 3 pairs that you ought to never splits?4s, 5s, and 10s.

You won?t split 4s because you?re better off trying to get a hard total of 18 by taking another card. If you split, you?ll find yourself with 2 hands which are likely to become a total of 14, that is no fun to play.

You won?t split 5s because you?re probably going to double down. Since you?re probably going to have a 10 or an ace, you?re likely to improve to a 20 or 21 a large percentage of the time. That?s a lot better than having 2 hands with a starting card of 5. (Those hands will probably total 15 when you get your extra card, which is another stiff hand.)

And you won?t split 10s because a hard total of 20 is such a great hand that it doesn?t need much improvement.

That leaves the following pairs to learn a strategy rule for:

2s
3s
4s
6s
7s
9s
The guideline is that the bigger the cards are, the more likely you are to desire to split. For instance, splitting 9s is correct unless the dealer has a 7, 10, or an ace showing.

You?ll split 7s unless the dealer has an 8 or more showing.

You?ll split 6s unless the dealer includes a 7 or higher showing.

More often than not, you won?t split your hand if the dealer comes with an 8 or more showing. In the event that you assume the dealer has a 10 in the hole, you?ll be assuming the dealer has an 18. You don?t desire to put more income into action when the dealer has such a good hand.

8. Soft hands will be the trickiest hands to play
You?ll double down with a soft total much more often than with a hard total. That?s because you stand a good potential for improving in a lot of situations without a large amount of risk. It?s hard to go bust when you're able to change the value of one card (the ace) by 10 points.

You?ll always hit any soft 17 or less. But frequently, if the dealer has a 6 or less, you won?t just hit?you?ll double down. In fact, you?ll always double down with a soft 17 or less if the dealer has a 5 or 6 showing. Those will be the worst possible cards for the dealer.

You?ll almost always stand with a soft 18 or higher. You?ll be more likely to hit if the dealer includes a 9, 10, or ace showing, though.

Sufficient reason for a soft 18 pitched against a dealer 6 or less, you?ll almost always double down.

Also, not all casinos enable you to double down on soft totals. Some casinos have a house rule where you could only double down on a 9, 10,or 11, or some combination of those.

9. You don?t need a chart to understand basic strategy
In fact, trying to memorize a table is just about the hardest solution to learn basic strategy. I much prefer to think about individual hands and how exactly to play those.

If I were learning basic strategy from scratch, I?d begin by making a list of the possible hard totals.

I?d then memorize exactly how to play each of them in every situation.

The first item on the list would be ?hard 8 or less?. The technique for playing that hand is to always hit. Understanding why that?s the right play makes it simpler to remember the strategy.

The 2nd item on the list will be ?hard 9?. The correct way to play that's to double down against a dealer 3, 4, 5, or 6. In all other situations, hit. Because you can?t bust a complete of hard 9, it?s an easy task to remember that you?re always going to hit or double down.

I?d just continue from there and get to pairs and soft hands.

You?ll be surprised at how fast you can learn these guidelines.

Flash cards certainly are a good idea, too. It is possible to discard the cards for the hands you know how exactly to play and concentrate on the ones you must memorize.

This maximizes the amount of learning versus the period of time you?re spending.

Plenty of writers act like memorizing basic strategy is some kind of Herculean task, but it?s not really that hard?particularly when you learn a few of the thinking behind the decisions.

Assuming there?s a 10 in the hole is helpful, although that doesn?t always result in the right decision.Some individuals love making New Years? resolutions, but most break those resolutions almost immediately.

I?m one of them.

For 2017, I thought I?d make a dozen resolutions related to gambling and share them here.

I?ll try to remember to update this website with a post by the end of the entire year explaining how well I did so at sticking with these resolutions.

1. I resolve to play slots less often.
Slot machines are a lot of fun, however they?re a pricey game to play. Not merely am I creating a lot of bets each hour, the house?s edge on those bets is sky-high.

The common slots player makes 600 spins per hour. I visited the Winstar Casino in Oklahoma with a pal of mine last spring, and I watched her pressing the spin button repeatedly at a lightning pace. She had to be making 800 spins each hour.

I, on the other hand, played at a more sedate pace.

But I?m sure I was making typically at least 500 spins per hour.

Compared to almost every other casino games, that?s an insane quantity of action, even though you?re playing for lower stakes.

The home edge on a slot machine game game reaches least 5%, however the average is probably nearer to 9%. For purposes of writing about this, I?ll split the difference and say the house edge is 7%.

How much cash am I likely to lose if I play for a dollar a spin?

The expected loss each hour is the level of action multiplied by the house edge. At 500 spins per hour, I?m putting $500 into action.

7% of that is $35.

That?s a higher hourly loss compared to nearly every other game.

I?ll consider the expected hourly loss for a few of the other games I love below.

2. I resolve to play video poker more often.
Video poker plays just as fast as slots for a skilled player. Let?s face it?as soon as you?ve mastered the game, you don?t spend lots of time sitting there laboring over each decision.

The difference comes from the house edge. Even on the worst video poker games, the home edge is only 5% or 6%. The very best games have a residence edge of less than 1%. For purposes of calculating hourly expected loss, we?ll split the difference can call it 3% on average.

Expert players probably stick with the games where the house edge is 2% or less. Another factor to consider is that obtaining the edge that low involves a qualification of skill, too. I?m good at video poker strategy, but I?m far from a master.

But even with a residence edge of 3%, the amount I?m losing at video poker is dramatically less than at the slot machines.

I play mostly quarter machines, nevertheless, you will have to bet 5 coins per hand at video poker. (You would like to activate the bonus payout for the royal flush.)

That?s $1.25 per hand. At 500 hands per hour, that?s $625 in action per hour.

3% of this is $18.75, which is almost half the expected hourly loss that I?d see playing slots.

And video poker is more compelling, because I've the added challenge of earning the right decisions as I play.

3. I resolve to remain out of debt?unless it?s smart debt.
Borrowing money to fund your gambling is nearly always a bad idea. I tend to like casino gambling, and I understand that the house has an edge on every bet on every game in the casino. Borrowing money to fund that activity is foolish?particularly if I?m repaying interest on that money.

I have friends who?ve maxed out bank cards with payday loans and lost almost all their money playing craps with it. If you?re going to play with borrowed money, craps is as good a casino game as any and much better than most.

But in the event that you play long enough, you?ll lose.

And most gamblers I understand aren?t disciplined enough to get rid of their personal credit card debt first thing should they?re winners. They?re more likely to blow the money in the bar.

But some debt can be smart debt.

If I could play poker on a specialist level, it might be worth my while to take on investors. I have a good friend who played poker professionally for years, but he played with an investor?s money. Their deal was that his investor would suffer the losses (if any), but he'd get 50% of the winnings. I?m not sure how often they settled up.

Recently, Greg Raymer announced he was taking investors for his action throughout 2017. He was selling shares in his bankroll at $1000 per share, and he was buying 20 shares himself. He was hoping to improve a bankroll of between $60,000 and $120,000.

Here?s how Raymer?s deal works:

He settles up by the end of the entire year. If he breaks even, you obtain your investment back. If he loses money, you lose proportionally using the level of your investment.

If he wins, you get 60%, and he gets 40% for playing.

My pal the pro poker player explained this is a good investment. Greg Raymer is a great player and he?s in the top 1% of the field when it comes to integrity.

4. I resolve to understand basic strategy in blackjack.
I can work with a blackjack basic strategy chart, but I?d favour it memorized (for reasons that may become clear later in this article).

I know the correct play for most hands in most situations, but not every submit every situation.

And if you want to milk every tenth of a percent from the casino, you need perfect basic strategy.

And you need to execute that strategy perfectly, too.

Even so, blackjack is a negative expectation game. The expected hourly loss is better than any game in the casino, though.

Here?s why:

You?re going to place far fewer bets each hour playing blackjack than you will at slots or video poker. You?re considering 50 hands per hour at a complete table, or 200 hands per hour if you?re the only player.

We?ll split the difference again and assume 125 hands per hour.

At $5 per hand, we?re putting $625 into action each hour.

But instead of losing 5% or more, we?re looking at a house edge of 0.5%. (If the rules aren?t great, maybe 1%.)

Splitting the difference again, and enabling the casual mistake, I?ll assume an average house edge of 0.75% at blackjack.

My expected hourly loss is 0.75% multiplied by $625, or $4.69/hour.

THAT is cheap entertainment.

5. I resolve to obtain re-acquainted with card counting.
I don?t desire to stop there, though. Once I?ve mastered basic strategy, my plan is to move on to start out counting cards.

Make no mistake, I have no plans to become a professional gambler. If I did, I wouldn?t choose blackjack anyway.

But easily?m going to be playing blackjack anyway, maybe I can sway the odds a little more in my own favor by counting cards.

A specialist card counter can get 1% or 2% over the casino, but I?d be happy to count cards sufficiently to play at break even.

Counting cards sufficiently to accomplish this isn?t that hard.

Mastering basic strategy may be the first step.

Raising and lowering my bets based on the count is enough to access break even. I don?t even plan to make changes to my strategy in line with the count.

Even though I?m a break-even player, I?ll turn out ahead on blackjack because I intend to make use of the casino?s comps and perks.

Most card counters don?t want to belong to the ball player?s club. They would like to avoid detection.

But since I?m not likely to play sufficiently for the casino to back me off, I?m not concerned about that.

I want to obtain the most comps for my money.

The casino will assume that I?ll lose 2% when they?re calculating my value as a player. If I?m a break-even player, all those comps come my method for free.

You can find out about this strategy and the mindset behind it by reading Max Rubin?s excellent book, Comp City.

6. I resolve to enter more poker tournaments.
I?m not a great poker player, but I'm better than average. And although slots aren?t an option for me anymore, I love having a shot at an enormous jackpot.

Poker tournaments provide me with a double whammy:

They let me put my brain and skills to good use.

However they also give me a better-than-average potential for winning a life-changing amount of money.

I have friends who buy at least $5 worth of lottery tickets each week.

By the end of the year, they?ll have spent $250 or more on the lottery.

However the payback percentage for the lottery is awful. The house expects to win 50% of your money.

You?re considering an average annual loss of $125 if you?re playing the lottery every week.

I?d rather buy into several the daily no limit Texas hold em tournaments at the Winstar Casino. The entry fee is $65 most days, but I?m confident that I?m at least a break-even player.

EASILY get lucky in several those tournaments, I can take the winnings and reinvest them in to the main even of the World Group of Poker. The entry fee for that is $10,000, but we?re discussing a life-changing prize pool if I win that.

The top prize in the main event of the WSOP this past year was $8 million.

There was a time when I couldn?t retire on $8 million.

That point is passed. The older, older version of myself knows just how to make $8 million last the rest of his life.

7. I resolve to go to some different casino destinations.
You probably noticed predicated on most of my resolutions that I?m No advantage gambler. I know how exactly to use certain advantage gambling techniques, but I?m not proficient enough to earn a living playing these games.

Nor do I want to.

I make an okay living authoring gambling.

In fact, I?m not sure I've the temperament to be a professional gambler.

I?m in it for the fun, and I wish to have more fun in 2017.

That means getting out of my comfort zone and visiting some different casino destinations.

Most of the time I spent in a casino in 2016 was spent in another of two places:

The Choctaw Casino in Durant, Oklahoma
The WInstar Casino in Thackerville, Oklahoma
I resolve to get to a number of the cool casinos in NEVADA a few times this year. In fact, to pursue my strategy of getting comps by counting cards at blackjack and mastering basic strategy, I?ll need to travel to a major casino destination.

The blackjack games in Oklahoma charge a 50 cent ante per hand. You lose that amount in case you win the hand.

For a $100/hand player, that adds 0.5% to the home?s edge.

For a $10/hand player, that adds 5% to the house edge, which reduces blackjack to a casino game with an edge that?s as low as roulette and even slots.

9. I resolve to keep up a separate gambling bankroll.
Among the principal rules of bankroll management in gambling is to keep your gambling bankroll separate from your own other funds.

I?ll be honest.

I?ve had trouble with this particular before. I?ve never spent the rent money gambling, but I have dipped into my gambling bankroll to cover the occasional drink at the bar or the occasional meal at the buffet.

The problem with that is if it continues, it won?t take miss you to run out of money to gamble with.

A gambler without a bankroll can?t gamble.

I might lose my bankroll by the end of the year, but it?s not likely to be related to spending my bankroll on something other than gambling.

I like to gamble.

I don?t apologize for this.

But I?m going to be smarter about my method of managing my bankroll.

10. I resolve to invest more time writing about gambling.
I mentioned earlier in this article that I make a reasonable living writing about gambling. I?m not likely to get rich doing this?Stephen King has nothing to fear, actually.

But I understand I?ll make a better living by increasing my word count.

Every writer I understand gets paid by the word or by the project. Completing more projects and getting my average daily word total has as direct effect on my bottom line.

But just as importantly, writing about something forces one to think more rigorously about it.

Regarding gambling, easily think more rigorously about any of it, I?ll win additional money.

At least I?ll lose less.

11. I resolve to become more mindful.
A Bill Murray video where he discussed how he wanted to become more present became viral last year. In this video, he said that he though enjoying as soon as was important.

I couldn?t agree more.

One reason I intend to avoid slots is basically because it?s hard to be careful when playing. Slot machine play may be the opposite of mindfulness.

It?s mindlessness.

I?ve read multiple articles and even a book concerning the psychology of slot machine game games. The point of most of them is that slot machine players tend to get into a state resembling a trance.

I don?t wish to be hypnotized by a gambling machine.

12. I resolve to invest more time doing offers that don?t cost money.
While I love gambling, it?s not the only way I like to spend my time. I've twin daughters, both of whom are 14 years old now.

We enjoy playing board games and card games.

It?s a great way to spend time together doing something active (being present, being mindful) and hanging out with people I love.

On New Years? Eve, I found a card game called Race for the Galaxy and another card game called Cards Against Humanity.

I had to market my game collection after some duration ago, but this season, I?m likely to rebuild it.

But it?s not enough to just have a collection of board games or cards.

To get your money?s worth, you need to play them.

Getting in a while at the table doing offers with my daughters is worth more to me than any moment I spend at the blackjack or the poker tables.

In short, I?m committed to getting the maximum quantity of fun in trade for my gambling profit 2017. I've no plans to give up gambling or anything silly like that.

But I am going to focus more on treating gambling like my other entertainment expenses and do my best to obtain the most value for my money.

I think the main resolution I?ve made involves being more mindful.

That?s an excellent resolution for anybody, even non-gamblers.Everything that happens at the baccarat table is determined by basic mathematical principles. The chances of the hand you bet on to win are based 100% on the cards in the shoe. And over time, the odds always workout exactly how they?re supposed to work out.

The nice thing about math and gambling is you could?t change factual statements about math. Understanding the math behind baccarat will undoubtedly give you have an improved chance to win.

Here are six facts about baccarat that involve math that you may start using immediately. All these tidbits of knowledge can help enhance your results at the tables.

1 ? Baccarat Tie Wager Math
Anytime you use math to compare gambling games or wager opportunities, the ultimate way to compare them is using two percentages. Both percentages are the house edge and the go back to player. And when you have one of these percentages, it is possible to quickly obtain the other.

For example, the house edge on the tie wager at the baccarat table is 14.36%. To obtain the go back to player percentage, subtract 14.36% from 100%. This implies the go back to player on the tie wager is 85.64%.

In the event that you aren?t familiar with the home edge or return percentages of casino games, that is one of the worst bets in a casino. Almost every slots game offers a better return, and slots are usually on the list of worst returns.

From the mathematical standpoint, the tie wager in baccarat is so bad that you need to never make it whatever. The odd and returns are simply too detrimental to your bankroll.

Don?t make the mistake of convinced that the tie bet is decent since it pays back at a higher rate than 1 to at least one 1. This is already contained in the math that has been used to determine the house edge and return, and it?s still an awful wager option.

2 ? Baccarat Player Wager Math
Another two main wager options once you play baccarat are much better than the tie wager. But you still have to compare all your options in order that you know which option supplies the best return.

Your other two wagers are player bets and banker bets. In real money baccarat, each player doesn?t receive their very own hand like generally in most casino games. Instead, two hands are dealt on each round, with one hand designated as ?the player hand? and another hand designated as ?the banker hand.?

Baccarat

Because of the way the guidelines are set up, the banker hand has an advantage on the player hand. But the banker hand wager also pays a commission to make the overall edge and return closer. The banker hand is still slightly better than the ball player hand, even with the commission is deducted.

The player hand has a set house edge of 1 1.24%. This means the return is 98.76%. The ball player bet ranks in the very best of any set of casino wagers as far as the house edge and return. It?s better than any bet you?d find at roulette, slots, craps, most video poker machines, and any table casino game except some blackjack games.

But it?s still not the very best wager at the baccarat table.

3 ? Baccarat Banker Wager Math
The top bet at the baccarat table from a mathematical standpoint may be the banker bet. The edge the casino is wearing this wager is 1.06%. This creates a return at 98.94%.

To place this into perspective, the only options in the casino that are better than this are some blackjack games and a few video poker machines. Craps has one wager that?s better, but you have to make a wager that?s worse than this in order to be allowed to place the better wager.

In addition, to get a better return at the blackjack table, you have to find games with good rules and use the proper strategies, that is difficult. To obtain a higher return playing video poker, you should use perfect strategy and discover machines that have the correct pay tables. And these machines are difficult to find.

Some gamblers ignore baccarat, this teaches you why baccarat ought to be toward the top of your list of games if you use math to gamble.

The normal commission for the banker wager is 5%, but you can occasionally find a casino running a special promotion that charges a lesser percentage. At these times, the return is even higher.

4 ? Using Baccarat Math for Bet Sizing
Now that you understand the very best baccarat wager option, it?s time to use math to find out what the best wager size is once you play. This can be a simple math equation. As soon as you see exactly how it works, you need to use it to look for the best wager size for just about any casino game.

The very best wager size once you play baccarat is zero. That is also the best wager size for any other casino game which has a house edge, that is basically every casino game if you don't understand how to use advantage gambling methods.

In other words, the way to lose the least amount of money would be to not play any casino game at all. But if you do plan to play baccarat, the next best wager amount is the lowest amount the casino enables you to risk.

If the table minimum is $10, then this is actually the amount you need to risk. In the event that you play baccarat online and the table minimum is $1, then you should risk $1.

You can multiply the home edge percentage with the amount of your wager to find out just how much your average loss is going to be. If you bet $100 on banker, your average loss is $1.06. If you bet $100 on player, your average loss is $1.24. And when without a doubt $100 on the tie, your average loss is $14.36.

In the event that you didn?t trust me when I told you the tie bet was terrible, this teaches you why using real-world dollars and cents.

Here?s what really matters concerning this: If you bet a lot more than the minimum amount once you play baccarat, or any other casino game, you lose additional money.

5 ? Baccarat Side Bet Math
I?m not likely to spend much time on discussing all of the possible baccarat side wager options. The key reason why I?m not going to spend much time on side bets in baccarat is basically because it?s a waste of time. In fact, everything you need to know about math and baccarat side wagers could be contained in one sentence.

Casino Games

Every baccarat side wager is made to have a higher house edge and lower return percentage than the banker wager.

This means that there isn?t a baccarat side wager that you should ever consider making. The math demonstrates all of the available options are worse than the banker wager, and this is all you must know once you play baccarat.

6 ? Useful Baccarat Bonus Math
The ultimate thing I?m likely to teach you about using math when you play baccarat handles online and mobile baccarat. The overall game is the same whether you play in a live casino or in a digital casino, but online and mobile casinos sometimes give bonuses to baccarat players.

You know what the house edge is for every baccarat bet, and you also know how to determine your average loss. You can use this information to compare baccarat bonuses. Learn how much you need to bet with each baccarat bonus, then regulate how much you?re likely to lose playing that much.

For example, when you have to bet $30,000 to clear a baccarat bonus, you understand you?re likely to lose around $318 once you make your entire wagers on banker.

Now, look at the total quantity of the bonus and compare it to how much you?re going to lose. Most bonuses are designed in order that you lose a lot more than the bonus is actually worth. And when this can be the case, you?re likely to be better off skipping the bonus.

No matter the method that you go through the math, the only real baccarat wager that should ever be produced is on the banker hand. The ball player hand isn?t bad compared to almost every other casino games. But it?s not the best option at the baccarat table so we don?t recommend it.

The math also clearly shows the best bet size. If you bet more than the lowest amount available, you?re losing more money than you should.

No baccarat side bet has a return as high because the banker option, so that they should all be ignored. And make sure you use baccarat bonus math before claiming any bonus offers! All the best.
사설토토


Website: https://www.toto-1pro.com