Notes

Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create issues for users.
https://telegra.ph/What-lengths-Away-from-some-sort-of-5G-Mobile-Tower-system-Is-secure-04-25 is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).


The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For http://b3.zcubes.com/v.aspx?mid=11173446 , co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Read More: http://b3.zcubes.com/v.aspx?mid=11173446