Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

safe distance from cell tower are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Read More: https://note1s.com/notes/4X6UKN1