Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.

While this sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, safe distance from cell tower is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. https://rose-iris-wb0k5m.mystrikingly.com/blog/what-is-the-minimum-acceptable-range-between-yourself-along-with-a-5g-mobile includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.


Read More: https://coalzoo3.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/26/what-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-system/