Notes

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While Visit this page but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.


While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Read More: https://squareblogs.net/musicpocket5/what-lengths-can-you-get-from-your-5g-mobile-tower-without-becoming-unsafe