Notes

What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. safe distance from cell tower look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For Additional info , a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure


The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Here's my website: https://pastebin.pl/view/d519ca96