Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell System?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/c7f54a78-5fa4-4a10-a514-69fc1553d37e is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

My Website: https://pastelink.net/i6497hyn