Notes

Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System?
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. safe distance to live from cell phone tower 's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.


However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, safe distance from cell tower should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

Homepage: https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/woolennode2/activity/129213/