Notes

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can result in a wide range of potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, safe distance to live from cell phone tower is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. what is a safe distance from a cell tower includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).


The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. safe distance from cell tower would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Read More: https://fry-benjamin.federatedjournals.com/how-far-away-can-one-be-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-structure-before-becoming-harmful