Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.


The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For https://zenwriting.net/talkdaisy77/very-best-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-system , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, safe distance from cell tower should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

My Website: https://click4r.com/posts/g/9236936/