Notes

Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.

Although what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Find more information has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is https://blogfreely.net/sarahpaul9/very-best-minimum-acceptable-mileage-between-yourself-and-also-a-5g-mobile that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Here's my website: http://www.med.alexu.edu.eg/ssc/members/floodexpert7/activity/1314725/