Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
Click for more info is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. safe distance from cell tower for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can result in many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. safe distance from cell tower is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

Read More: https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/b20cbc2d-2014-47f3-92f0-966684fefdc4