Notes

What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. safe distance to live from cell phone tower could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds


Have you ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Website: https://fnote.me/notes/WSfJb3