Notes

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.


The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As what is a safe distance from a cell tower , they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, what is a safe distance from a cell tower and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

My Website: https://click4r.com/posts/g/9236430/