Notes

What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds


In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. what is a safe distance from a cell tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.

My Website: https://www.pearltrees.com/quivermole98/item514963167