Notes

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create issues for users.

A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

website ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Website: https://notes.io/qNccJ