Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. safe distance from cell tower look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.


The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

My Website: https://pastebin.pl/view/7915bc5a