Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If https://anotepad.com/notes/x9bj3hcs 've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).


safe distance to live from cell phone tower ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. safe distance from cell tower can lead to an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

My Website: https://ipsen-ochoa-2.federatedjournals.com/what-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-system-1682757339