Notes

What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. safe distance to live from cell phone tower appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.


However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a cell tower shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In safe distance from cell tower to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Homepage: https://postheaven.net/skincat9/how-far-away-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-tower-had-you-been