Notes

What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.

While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.


This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Website: https://note1s.com/notes/QY1LT96Q