Notes

Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

Look at more info are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.


Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is safe distance from cell tower that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

My Website: https://notes.io/qN5Fq