Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell System?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, https://anotepad.com/notes/cgirpq6x is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As what is a safe distance from a cell tower , they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.


In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Here's my website: https://anotepad.com/notes/cgirpq6x