Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.


safe distance from cell tower are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. safe distance to live from cell phone tower for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for safe distance to live from cell phone tower exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Read More: https://note1s.com/notes/JJ5A3N4