Notes

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since safe distance from cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.


Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.


Here's my website: https://ctxt.io/2/AACQY0tHFw