Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower?
If https://skaarup-skovgaard.mdwrite.net/very-best-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-tower-1682799097 've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.


These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were far from antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. https://click4r.com/posts/g/9302345/ can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Here's my website: https://skaarup-skovgaard.mdwrite.net/very-best-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-tower-1682799097