Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If safe distance from cell tower 've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
safe distance from cell tower is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.


Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For safe distance from cell tower , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Website: http://voicejuly3.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/34058837-how-long-can-you-get-from-the-5g-portable-tower-without-being-unsafe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog