Notes

Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?
If safe distance to live from cell phone tower 've ever been through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

Read More: https://ctxt.io/2/AACQy0AzEA