Notes

Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

Discover more are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. safe distance from cell tower is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.



Additionally there is https://ctxt.io/2/AACQI_74FA that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.


Homepage: https://onepetcare.com/members/satinpillow64/activity/173514/