Notes

What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
https://onepetcare.com/members/pintnode8/activity/149678/

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

Although what is a safe distance from a cell tower may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

However, what is a safe distance from a cell tower revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Read More: https://onepetcare.com/members/pintnode8/activity/149678/