Notes

What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.


Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For https://dewdanger98.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/30/are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower-system/ , a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for safe distance from cell tower exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Here's my website: https://dewdanger98.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/30/are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower-system/