Notes

What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

Continue reading are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. safe distance from cell tower 's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther your location from the tower.

Although what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).

This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal and the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.

Read More: https://controlc.com/48e23697