Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

Since what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, what is a safe distance from a cell tower is the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
safe distance from cell tower for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Read More: https://squareblogs.net/womengallon4/what-lengths-away-can-one-be-from-a-5g-mobile-tower-system-before-becoming