Notes

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

https://www.pearltrees.com/olivebeaver7/item515080441 are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.

The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.

Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

safe distance from cell tower is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

safe distance to live from cell phone tower ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Here's my website: https://www.pearltrees.com/olivebeaver7/item515080441