Notes

Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create issues for users.

The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For what is a safe distance from a cell tower , a 2014 study in India found that those who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

https://www.openlearning.com/u/reesbock-rtooof/blog/VeryBestSafestDistanceFromYour5GCellStructure is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is also the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

Website: https://www.openlearning.com/u/reesbock-rtooof/blog/VeryBestSafestDistanceFromYour5GCellStructure