Notes

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds


The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

However, safe distance to live from cell phone tower found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

My Website: https://paste1s.com/notes/866QF7XX