Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. what is a safe distance from a cell tower look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.


This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. safe distance from cell tower is also the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As safe distance to live from cell phone tower , they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Read More: https://zenwriting.net/groundronald0/what-lengths-can-you-go-from-your-5g-mobile-phone-tower-without-getting-unsafe