Notes

What is the safest distance from a 5G cell System?
If https://searchmay3.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/27/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-system/ 've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. what is a safe distance from a cell tower appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In what is a safe distance from a cell tower is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Here's my website: https://onepetcare.com/members/theoryvault2/activity/141603/