Notes

What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure


Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

what is a safe distance from a cell tower is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such safe distance to live from cell phone tower shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Here's my website: https://fnote.me/notes/9Lq5sN