Notes

Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.

While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. safe distance from cell tower include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

http://needlesnake8.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33975113-what-is-the-safest-distance-from-the-5g-cell-tower?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.


Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Website: https://www.openlearning.com/u/jimenezguzman-rtp4tz/blog/HowLongAwayCanOneBeFromANew5GMobileTowerSystemBeforeBecomingRisky