Notes

What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system?
If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

safe distance from cell tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.


However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

In the event that you've used cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.

Although safe distance to live from cell phone tower may sound like a good idea however, those living close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Website: https://telegra.ph/What-lengths-Can-You-Get-From-your-5G-Mobile-phone-Tower-Without-Getting-Unsafe-04-26