Notes

What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System?
If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.


While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.

This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. safe distance to live from cell phone tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

Homepage: https://telegra.ph/Are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5G-cell-System-04-26-3