Notes

FM There are existing published research articles that have mentioned ChatGPT.

FM ChatGPT is also being advertised in social media and other platforms.

FM ChatGPT can be used as a guide instead of as a cheating tool.

FM The participant is in favor of the integration of ChatGPT in education but only with the condition of having modifications done to regulate the use.

FM ChatGPT serves the same function google, only that using ChatGPT saves more time as it summarizes all the data from the internet.

FM The top most ethical consideration that could be violated with the integration of ChatGPT is the students academic integrity.

FM Plagiarism is also an ethical consideration that needs to be addressed.

FM Perseverance as a student and hardwork are also ethical considerations that needs to be addressed, as said by the respondent, technology can make a student reliant, hindering their personal growth and skill enhancement.

FM The growth of students as academic individuals are hindered due to their reliance to the A.I.

FM Accountability and transparency can be achieved by having strong background of principles.

FM Some schools have included in their budget, applications that will assist them in determining whether a work submitted by a student is A.I. generated, this, however, according to the participant, is not for all schools, therefore, some schools will find it hard to combat too much A.I. usage (plagiarizing A.I.).

FM ChatGPT provides assistance to students who exploits the program to receive grades they do not deserve.

FM Schools can create guidelines for students to know how to properly use ChatGPT in order to highlight it’s positive impacts on users.

FM In order for guidelines to be made, experimental and empirical studies should first be made, in order for those to be used as the basis for making the guidelines.

FM Studies should be made to use as a basis, before making guidelines.

FM Teachers are already well equipped with the basic knowledge of the potential harm technology has in the classroom.

FM Conducting trainings or seminars will have multiple reactions, some wanting to remain with the traditional approaches, due to the intergenerational types of teachers, ranging from generation X, generation Z, to even baby boomers.

FM Teachers need to have knowledge concerning ICT in order to leverage ChatGPT effectively in the classroom.

FM Teachers who have a background on ICT will see the potential ChatGPT has, more than those who do not. It fully leverage ChatGPT as the users, the teachers in this case, appreciate and are interested in the program.

FM Research should be done, before conducting a training program so that it can be used as a basis.

FM In order for people to see having workshops about ChatGPT in any level in the academe, there must be empirical evidences supporting the fact that it has positive impacts, to give them a hindsight that it is proven to be “good”.

FM Incorporating ChatGPT into the education sector can result in improved time efficiency for students.

FM ChatGPT can contribute to enhanced productivity in the education sector.

FM The continuous evolution of technology has broader implications for ChatGPT in the education sector.

FM The negative long-term effects of incorporating ChatGPT in education include potential over-reliance on the tool, misuse or exploitation, and the inadvertent encouragement of dishonesty among students.

FM Rubrics cannot be made unless researches have been conducted concerning the topic.

FM It will take years before rubrics can be made for ChatGPT as it requires further researches not limited to national studies.

Sir Cun